• 9964432222
  • Mail Us
  • Appointment
  • Locate Us
  • Chat Now
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Register
Manifest IAS
JournalsOfIndia
Manifest Learning Academy
  • Home
  • SNIPPETSfor Prelims
  • ARTICLESfor Mains
  • BROWSEBY SOURCE
  • DOWNLOADS
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • SNIPPETSfor Prelims
  • ARTICLESfor Mains
  • BROWSEBY SOURCE
  • DOWNLOADS
No Result
View All Result
JournalsOfIndia
No Result
View All Result
Home Law & Policy

Indra Sawhney Judgement

March 25, 2021
in Law & Policy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Indra Sawhney Judgement
213
VIEWS
Share on WhatsAppShare on TelegramShare on Facebook
image_pdfMake PDF

In news : While considering the validity of the reservation for the Maratha community in Maharashtra on March 8 the Supreme Court has decided that it will hear all the States on the 50% limit on total reservation imposed by the court in the Indra Sawhney case (1992)

What did the Court say?

  • Supreme Court of India’s five-member Constitution Bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan wants to decide whether the judgment in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India, known as the Mandal verdict, needs to be referred to a larger Bench or “requires a relook in the light of subsequent Constitutional amendments, judgments and changed social dynamics of society, etc.” 
  • This is because the earlier judgment had declared that reservation cannot exceed 50% in total. As Indra Sawhney was a decision by a nine-member Bench, a Bench of at least 11 judges will be needed to reconsider the question.
  • The Supreme Court also wants to consider whether the reservation for Marathas effected through a 2018 Act (the Socially Economically Backward Class Act), and amended in 2019, is covered by the “exceptional circumstances” mentioned in the Indra Sawhney judgment, which had said the 50% limit can be exceeded in “certain extraordinary situations” as a special case. 
  • The Court said this relaxation was meant for people inhabiting remote and far-flung areas who are away from the mainstream of national life and who may have “conditions peculiar to and characteristic to them”.
  • Therefore, any judgment on the Maratha reservation issue would inevitably have to deal with three issues the 50% ceiling on total reservation, the power of States to determine who its backward classes are and confer benefits on them, and the legislative competence of State legislatures regarding backward classes after the introduction of the 102nd Amendment

 Supreme Court judgement in Indra Sawhney case

Background of the case

The Second Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission) was set up in1979 to determine the criteria for defining the socially and educationally backward classes. The Mandal report identified 52% of the population at that time as “Socially and Economically Backward Classes” (SEBCs) and recommended 27% reservation for SEBCs in addition to the previously existing 22.5% reservation for SC/STs.

In 1990, when the V P Singh led-government set out to implement the Mandal report, it was challenged in court amidst widespread protests against the move. The case came up before a nine-judge Bench and a 6:3 verdict was delivered in 1992.

Key highlights of the verdict

  • It said that just as every power must be exercised reasonably and fairly, the power conferred by Clause (4) of Article 16 should also be exercised in a fair manner and within reasonable limit — and what is more reasonable than to say that reservation … shall not exceed 50% of the appointments or posts…?” 
  • Citing Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s opinion in the Constituent Assembly that reservation should be “confined to a minority of seats”, the Bench fixed the maximum permissible quota at 50%. 
  • While committing to the constitutional position that reservations are not an ‘exception’ but a ‘facet’ of equality, the majority in Indra Sawhney also invokes the idea of balancing the equality of opportunity of backward classes ‘against’ the right to equality of everyone else. 

The landmark Indra Sawhney ruling set two important precedents.

  • First, the Court said that the criteria for a group to qualify for reservation is “social and educational backwardness”. 
  • Additionally, the court also reiterated the 50% limit to vertical quotas it had set out in earlier judgements in 1963 (M R Balaji v State of Mysore) and in 1964 (Devadasan v Union of India), reasoning that it was needed to ensure “efficiency” in administration. 
  • The court said this 50% limit will apply unless in “exceptional circumstances”.
  • While the social and educational backwardness criteria stemmed from interpretation of various constitutional provisions, the 50% limit is often criticised as being an arbitrary limit.

Other cases related to reservation

  • M.R. Balaji vs State of Mysore (1962): It was in this case that the  Supreme Court had first ruled that reservation, being a special provision for backward classes, should not normally exceed 50%. 

State of Kerala vs N.M Thomas case: The majority of the Bench disagreed with the proposition. It said the special measures in favour of backward classes in Articles 15 and 16 were not exceptions to the rule. It was held that the 50% norm in Balaji was only a rule of caution and does not exhaust all categories.

image_pdfMake PDF
Source: The Hindu & IE
Tags: News PaperPrelims

Related Posts

Parliament is North Star of Democracy

Parliament is North Star of Democracy

February 6, 2023
Who are puisne judges?

Who are puisne judges?

February 2, 2023
AISHE report

AISHE report

January 31, 2023
Grievance appellate committees to address users complaints against internet-based platforms

Grievance appellate committees to address users complaints against internet-based platforms

January 30, 2023
Euthanasia and a living will

Euthanasia and a living will

January 26, 2023
What is mandatory minimum sentencing?

What is mandatory minimum sentencing?

January 26, 2023
Law on lawyers advertising their work in India

Law on lawyers advertising their work in India

January 25, 2023
What are emergency provisions under the Information Technology Rules, 2021

What are emergency provisions under the Information Technology Rules, 2021

January 24, 2023
NCERT notified India’s first national assessment regulator- PARAKH

NCERT notified India’s first national assessment regulator- PARAKH

January 24, 2023
Rural Health Statistics 2021-2022

Rural Health Statistics 2021-2022

January 23, 2023
Please login to join discussion
JournalsOfIndia

Our vision is to orient the readers to grasp the facts objectively and analyse critically. In the rush of reaching first to the readers, the websites miss the balanced opinion, which is the need of the hour. We aim to reach the readers with more crispness, preciseness and relevance. We bring the articles in UPSC way for the civil services aspirants and the Wisest Way for general readers.

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Disaster Management
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Ethics
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Geography
  • Governance
  • History
  • Law & Policy
  • Opinion
  • People in News
  • Places in News
  • Science & Tech
  • Security
  • Society
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Browse by Tag

AIR All India Radio BBC Business Line Business Standard dow Down to Earth DownToEarth DTE Economic Times ET FAO Financial Express GS-1 GS-2 GS-3 GS-4 Hindustan Times IE India & the world Indian express Indiatoday India today Kurukshetra Livelihoods portal LiveMint Mains News News Paper Newspaper PIB Prelims PRS India RSTV Science Reporter Survey The Hindu The India Express The Indian Express The Print the wire Times of India TOI TOPPERS Yojana

Newsletter

The most important UPSC news and events of the day.

Get Journals daily newsletter on your inbox.

© 2020 JournalsOfIndia - A free initiative by Manifest Team.

  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Home
  • SNIPPETS
  • ARTICLES
  • BROWSE
  • DOWNLOADS
No Result
View All Result

© 2020 JournalsOfIndia - A free initiative by Manifest Team.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In